S

STORY LAW

Child Custody   Incarceration

Helping Washington Families Navigate Life's Most Challenging Times for Over 35 Years

Child Custody   Incarceration

Child Custody After Incarceration in Washington

Coming home after Incarceration can feel like stepping onto a moving treadmill. You’re trying to rebuild life, rebuild trust, and rebuild routines—while the world (and your child) didn’t hit pause. When Child Custody and Visitation are part of the picture, the learning curve can be steep.

This article is general information, not legal advice. A Child Custody Lawyer can help you apply Washington law to your specific facts.

First, a quick reality check: “custody” usually means a parenting plan

In Washington, courts typically use a parenting plan that covers (1) a residential schedule (where the child stays on which days) and (2) decision-making (school, health care, and other major decisions). Many people still say “custody,” but the parenting plan is the document that does the work.

When a parent has been incarcerated, the parenting plan may already limit time, may be outdated, or may not reflect what’s possible now that the parent is back in the community. The big legal theme is usually the same: the court focuses on the child’s best interests and stability.

Why incarceration creates unique visitation challenges

Most parenting challenges after incarceration are not “one big problem.” They are a pile of smaller ones:

  • Time gaps: a child’s routines, needs, and preferences can change a lot during a sentence.
  • Trust issues: the other parent may be worried about safety, reliability, or relapse.
  • Logistics: transportation, work schedules, housing stability, and supervision requirements can complicate everything.
  • Communication barriers: contact from a facility can be limited to approved calls, mail, or video sessions.
  • Court paperwork: the existing plan may not match the current reality, and informal agreements can fall apart quickly.

The good news is that Washington law gives courts tools to create safe, structured parenting time when appropriate.

What Washington courts look at when there are safety concerns

Washington has specific rules that allow (and sometimes require) limitations on a parent’s time or decision-making when the court finds certain serious issues—such as domestic violence, abuse, or other safety risks. These limitations live in RCW 26.09.191.

Important point: incarceration by itself does not automatically decide your case. But the reasons for incarceration (and any ongoing risk factors) may matter a lot.

Examples of restrictions a court can order (depending on the facts) include:

  • supervised visitation (professional or sometimes a qualified lay supervisor, depending on access and circumstances)
  • limitations on overnights
  • requirements like treatment, evaluations, or compliance steps before increasing time
  • limits on decision-making authority

If there are safety issues, courts tend to prefer a plan that is structured and enforceable rather than vague and “hope-based.”

Can a parenting plan be changed after incarceration?

Sometimes yes—but Washington does not treat parenting plans like a weekly whiteboard that can be erased and rewritten on a whim. The law often requires a meaningful legal reason to change the plan.

Washington’s main parenting plan modification statute is RCW 26.09.260. It allows certain adjustments and modifications under specific standards, often tied to a substantial change in circumstances and the child’s best interests.

This is where strategy matters. In many cases, the most realistic approach is:

  • start with smaller, structured steps, and
  • build a documented pattern of consistency, then
  • seek a gradual increase rather than demanding a full schedule change on day one.

A practical roadmap for rebuilding parenting time after incarceration

Think of parenting time after incarceration like physical therapy. You don’t go from crutches to sprinting because you really mean it. You go step-by-step, and consistency is the proof.

Step 1: Get very clear on what the current court order says

Before anyone makes promises, check:

  • What does the parenting plan allow right now?
  • Are there restrictions under RCW 26.09.191?
  • Are exchanges, supervision, or communication rules spelled out?
  • Are there conditions to increase time (treatment, classes, sobriety monitoring, etc.)?

If the plan is old or unclear, your next steps may depend on whether you need an agreed update, a motion, or a more formal modification process.

Step 2: Start with reliable contact, even if it is small

In many families, early progress looks like:

  • short daytime visits
  • consistent weekly video calls
  • supervised time at a neutral location
  • a set routine (same day/time every week)

If you are the parent seeking time, think “reliable and boring” (in a good way). A predictable pattern builds trust faster than big promises.

Step 3: Use the “ladder plan” approach

A ladder plan is a schedule that increases in stages if things go well.

Example structure (not one-size-fits-all):

  • Stage 1: supervised visits weekly for X weeks
  • Stage 2: longer visits, still supervised or partly supervised
  • Stage 3: unsupervised daytime visits
  • Stage 4: overnights
  • Stage 5: expanded holiday and school break time

This approach can reduce conflict because it gives both parents a clear map. It also gives the court a structured plan if litigation becomes necessary.

Step 4: Document follow-through (without turning life into a surveillance show)

Courts respond to patterns. Helpful documentation can include:

  • showing up on time
  • completing programs
  • stable housing and a safe sleeping arrangement
  • consistent communication and respectful co-parenting messages
  • compliance with any legal requirements (probation conditions, no-contact rules, etc.)

If you are the other parent, documentation can help too—especially if you’re trying to show you are supporting safe contact while protecting the child.

Visitation while a parent is still incarcerated

Sometimes the question is not “after incarceration,” but “during.”

Washington’s Department of Corrections has visitation systems and rules for in-person and video visits, including application/approval processes for visitors. And Washington law specifically directs DOC to adopt policies that encourage parent-child contact where appropriate, recognizing children’s interest in maintaining contact.

In real life, visitation during incarceration often depends on:

  • facility rules
  • the child’s age and needs
  • the other parent’s cooperation
  • safety concerns and court orders

If there is a court order limiting contact, follow it. If there is no order but there are concerns, it may be wise to seek a clear, enforceable plan rather than making it up as you go.

Common problem areas (and how families address them)

“My child doesn’t want to go”

This happens. A child may feel anxious, angry, or simply unsure. Forcing a sudden “full weekend” can backfire.

Often, the better starting point is:

  • shorter visits
  • a familiar setting
  • a therapist-informed plan if the child has big feelings
  • gradual increases tied to comfort and consistency

“The other parent is gatekeeping”

If one parent blocks contact without legal authority, the solution is usually not escalation. It is structure.

Options can include:

  • mediation to build a workable ladder plan
  • a clear court motion when needed
  • adding detailed exchange rules and communication expectations

“I’m worried about safety”

If safety is the concern, Washington law allows restrictions and structured contact, including supervised visitation, when the facts support it.

Safety planning may include:

  • supervised time
  • neutral exchange locations
  • restrictions on certain people being present
  • treatment requirements
  • a clear process for reporting concerns

“We can’t agree on how to communicate”

A parenting plan can include communication rules (how, when, and about what). Many families do better with:

  • a co-parenting app
  • email only
  • a rule that messages stay child-focused
  • response-time expectations

Mediation vs litigation after incarceration

Many parents assume incarceration automatically means “we’re going to court.” Not always.

  • Mediation can work well when both parents are willing to try a step-up plan and share information.
  • Litigation may be necessary when there are safety concerns, repeated noncompliance, or serious disputes about what the child needs right now.

A strong Family Law strategy often uses both tools: stabilize first, then negotiate, then return to court only if needed.

Tips for the parent returning from incarceration

If you want more parenting time, you will usually make faster progress by focusing on three things:

  1. Consistency: show up, follow through, repeat.
  2. Stability: housing, work, routines, and safe adults around the child.
  3. Co-parenting behavior: respectful communication and child-focused decision-making.

Also, avoid the “all-or-nothing” trap. Courts and co-parents often respond better to a practical plan that grows over time than to a demand for immediate equal time.

Tips for the parent who has been the primary caregiver

If you have been carrying the day-to-day parenting load during incarceration, your role matters. You can protect your child while still supporting healthy contact when appropriate.

Practical steps include:

  • asking for a structured ladder plan
  • requesting supervision if warranted
  • keeping exchanges predictable
  • encouraging stable routines (sleep, school, activities)
  • documenting missed visits or concerns in a factual way

Supporting safe contact does not mean ignoring safety. It means building a plan that protects the child and reduces chaos.

When to talk with a child custody lawyer

You may want legal guidance if:

  • the parenting plan is outdated or unclear
  • the other parent refuses to follow the order
  • you need supervision or safety restrictions
  • you are seeking a step-up plan and the other parent won’t agree
  • you’re unsure what standard applies to the change you want

Because parenting plans are fact-sensitive, small details matter.

Working with Story Law in Bellevue, WA

If you’re facing Child Custody and visitation challenges connected to incarceration, you do not have to guess your way through it. A realistic plan can protect your child, reduce conflict, and create a clear path forward—whether the next step is negotiation, mediation, or court.

Story Law helps clients with Washington Family Law issues, including parenting plans, visitation disputes, and custody modifications. If you want help building a safe, workable plan, contact Story Law to speak with a Child Custody Lawyer about your options.

More Articles

Cryptocurrency in Divorce

Cryptocurrency in Washington Divorce: Digital Assets Guide

Division of Retirement Accounts

Dividing Retirement Accounts in a Washington Divorce

Selecting Litigation Lawyers

Litigation Lawyers in Bellevue: How to Choose Representation

Speak With a Bellevue Divorce & Family Law Lawyer

Family law problems move quickly, and the stakes are high. Whether you are facing divorce, a child custody dispute, or need guidance on a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, Story Law connects you directly with an attorney who is prepared to advise you and, when necessary, litigate on your behalf. Use the form here or call our Bellevue office to schedule a confidential consultation today.

Call (425) 688-1159 or Request Your Call Below

S

Irma Ozegovic   Divorce Lawyer   Story Law

Free 30-Minute Call for Litigation Questions

If your question is about a case in court—or you think it may head to court—you can schedule a free 30-minute consultation with an associate attorney. This call is limited to litigation issues and basic case direction.
  • General information only. No attorney-client relationship is created unless we agree in writing.
  • We may need a conflict check before the call is confirmed.